Crime Victim Rights Protection Act (Taiwan) | Overview & Full Text

I. Editorial Overview

(1) Historical Context

Taiwan’s victim support system originated with the enactment of the Crime Victim Protection Act in 1998, which primarily focused on financial compensation. However, due to social changes and rising human rights awareness, the old framework, which was disproportionately focused on compensation while lacking in support services, became inadequate. Furthermore, the compensation system, originally based on a subrogated claim model, often caused secondary victimization due to lengthy review processes, leading to public dissatisfaction.

In response to public opinion, President Tsai Ing-wen convened the National Conference on Judicial Reform in 2017. The conference resolved that the State should adopt a comprehensive and holistic approach to establish a human rights-based victim support system. This led to a full amendment completed in 2023, renaming the statute the Crime Victim Rights Protection Act.

(2) Why It Matters for Taiwan

The comprehensive revision of the Crime Victim Rights Protection Act represents a decisive shift from viewing victims as objects of protection to recognizing them as subjects of rights. At its core, the Act aligns Taiwan’s legal framework with international human rights standards by affirming crime victims as full rights-holders within the justice system. The revised Act draws extensively on international norms, including the UN Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Restorative Justice Programmes in Criminal Matters, and the EU Victims’ Rights Directive. Through this legislation, Taiwan seeks to establish a rights protection system capable of engaging in dialogue with the international community and giving effect to universal human rights values.

Guided by the Principle of the Social State and the Theory of State Responsibility, the Act fundamentally redefines the nature of crime victim compensation. State support for victims is no longer conceived as an advance payment on behalf of offenders under a subrogation model, but rather as a direct obligation owed by the State to its citizens. Accordingly, crime victim compensation is reclassified as a form of social welfare benefit, delivered through a fixed lump-sum scheme with no repayment requirement. This transformation significantly lowers access barriers and shortens review timelines, enabling the State to respond promptly to victims’ needs while assuming responsibility for crime prevention and social security.

Crucially, the Act substantially strengthens the professional role and institutional positioning of protection organizations. Through clearly defined statutory mandates, a central role within the service network, and formalized cross-agency coordination mechanisms, these organizations are no longer mere executors of administrative subsidies. Instead, they function as professional and autonomous victim support institutions with advocacy capacity and international connectivity. This institutional design enables Taiwan to engage in substantive cooperation and exchange with counterpart organizations in the European Union, the United States, Japan, and other jurisdictions.

(3) Core Principles

  • Establishing the victim as a subject of rights and aligning with international human rights standards.
  • Affirming the Principle of the Social State and the Theory of State Responsibility.
  • Redefining crime victim compensation as a social welfare benefit rather than a subrogated claim.
  • Adopting a family-centered model for support services.
  • Introduction of protective orders for crime victims.
  • Codification of Restorative Justice mechanisms.
  • Ensuring the professionalization and independence of victim support organizations.

(4) Terminology Notes

1. The Progressive Nature of Compensation: Social Welfare vs. Subrogation

A critical feature of the 2023 Crime Victim Rights Protection Act is the reclassification of “Crime Victim Compensation” as a Social Welfare Benefit. This represents a significant legislative innovation compared to traditional international standards.

  • International Standard (Subrogation Model):
    International norms, such as the UN Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power (Clause 12) and the Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation (Clause 15), generally view state compensation as a secondary remedy—triggered when the offender cannot pay—often operating under a “subrogation” model where the State pays the victim and then seeks reimbursement from the offender.
  • Taiwan’s Progressive Approach (Social Welfare Model):
    Taiwan has moved beyond the subrogation model. Under this Act, compensation is a direct state obligation to care for its citizens, independent of the offender’s ability to pay. It is non-refundable and does not require the State to sue the offender for reimbursement.
  • Relationship with Civil Damages:
    While this state-funded compensation provides basic economic security, it is not intended to cover full civil damages. Crucially, receiving this compensation does not preclude the victim from filing a civil lawsuit against the offender for full indemnification.

2. Multi-layered Definition of “Crime Victim” (Scope of Protection)

The concept of “Crime Victim” in this Act is not a single, monolithic definition. Instead, it encompasses three intersecting categories based on the type of rights exercised:

  • Category A: Recipients of Compensation (Strict Definition)
    Defined in Article 3, this group includes individuals whose life, physical integrity, or sexual autonomy has been infringed. They are eligible for financial compensation.
  • Category B: Recipients of Protection Services (Broad Definition)
    Defined in Article 13, this group is broader. It includes not only Category A but also victims of domestic violence, human trafficking, and serious crimes involving children or juveniles. They are eligible for support services (legal, psychological, emergency aid) even if they do not qualify for financial compensation.
  • Category C: Applicants for Protective Orders (Specific Definition)
    Defined in Article 35, this encompasses victims of specific crimes, including the newly added category of digital/internet sexual violence (e.g., non-consensual distribution of intimate images).
  • Family Members & Witnesses:
    • Family Members: Defined in Article 3 broadly to include long-term cohabiting non-relatives, ensuring protection extends beyond traditional blood relations.
    • Witnesses: Under Article 24, individuals who witnessed the crime are also eligible for psychological counseling and support services.

3. Role of the Protection Organization (AVS)

The Act mandates a “Protection Organization” to deliver services. In practice, this is the Association for Victims Support (AVS). Its role is defined by a “General yet Supplementary” principle:

  • The Principle of Priority (Article 2):
    The Act states that if other laws provide equal or better protection, those specific laws apply. Taiwan has specialized laws for specific victim groups, such as the Sexual Assault Crime Prevention Act, the Human Trafficking Prevention Act, and the Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act.
  • The Gap-Filling Function:
    The AVS serves as the universal safety net.
    1. It provides general services to all crime victims under this Act.

• 2. If a victim falls under a specialized law (e.g., Human Trafficking) but that specific system fails to provide adequate service or has gaps in coverage, the AVS provides supplementary services to ensuring no victim is left without support.

4. Official Source & Integrity Notice

The English text provided below is the official translation released by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of China (Taiwan). It is not a private translation by the author or this website.

  • Prevailing Text: In the event of any discrepancy or inconsistency between the English version and the original Chinese text, the Traditional Chinese version shall prevail.
  • Editorial Scope: The notes below are added by Victim Support Taiwan (VST) to provide contextual interpretation and legal analysis. They do not alter the official statutory text.

(5) How to Use This Document

This Act consists of a total of 103 articles. Readers are encouraged to navigate the full text using the following structure:

  • Foundational Rights (Articles 1–12, Chapter 1):
    Sets out the legislative purpose, competent authorities, protected persons, and the core rights of crime victims, establishing the normative foundation of victim rights.
  • Protection Services (Articles 13–34, Chapter 2):
    Details eligible beneficiaries, the scope of protection services, and funding subsidies.
  • Protective Orders (Articles 35–43, Chapter 3):
    Regulates application procedures, qualifying offenses, prohibited conduct, and legal consequences related to protective orders for crime victims.
  • Restorative Justice (Articles 44–49, Chapter 4):
    Outlines referral obligations of prosecutors or courts, procedural safeguards, and the confidentiality and professional principles governing restorative justice facilitators.
  • Crime Victim Compensation (Articles 50–74, Chapter 5):
    Specifies funding sources, eligible recipients, compensation amounts, review committees, and remedy procedures.
  • Protection Organizations (Articles 75–98, Chapter 6):
    Governs organizational structure, funding sources, board composition, professional staffing, branch systems, information disclosure, and complaint and remedy mechanisms.

II. Document Information

Official Title: Crime Victim Rights Protection ActPDF Download
Chinese Title: 犯罪被害人權益保障法PDF Download
Adopting Body: Legislative Yuan, Republic of China (Taiwan)
Date of Amendment: 2023-02-08
Resolution / Document Number: Presidential Order Hua-Zong-(1)-Yi-Zi No. 11200007261
Document Type: National Statute
Legal Status / Legal Effect: Fundamental Law on Victim Support and Protection
VST Edition: 2026-01-01 Version

III. Full Text



IV. VST Editorial Disclaimer

  • Disclaimer:The translation and editorial commentary reflect the author’s personal academic and professional views for public education and institutional comparison purposes only. Unless otherwise stated, content is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
  • How to Cite:
    Hsiao, I-Min. (2026). Crime Victim Rights Protection Act (Taiwan) | Overview & Full Text. Victim Support Taiwan. Retrieved from https://victim-support.tw/en/crime-victim-rights-protection-act/
  • Revision & Update Log: 2026-01-01 — Initial publication