I. Editorial Overview
(1) Historical Context
(2) Why It Matters for Taiwan
(3) Core Principles
- A concise editorial summary of 3–9 key principles for reading guidance only.)
- 1
- 2
- 3
(4) Terminology Notes
(5) How to Use This Document
II. Document Information
Official Title: Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law(PDF Download)
Chinese Title: 重大違反國際人權法和嚴重違反國際人道法行為的被害人獲得救濟和賠償權利的基本原則和準則(PDF Download)
Adopting Body: United Nations General Assembly
Date of Adoption: 2005-12-16
Resolution / Document Number: A/RES/60/147
Document Type: United Nations General Assembly resolution annexing a set of normative principles and guidelines
Legal Status / Legal Effect: Non-binding international instrument (soft law). While not legally binding per se, these Principles and Guidelines are widely recognized as authoritative interpretations and clarifications of existing obligations under international human rights law and international humanitarian law. They are frequently cited by international courts, human rights treaty bodies, special procedures, and domestic courts as persuasive authority.
VST Edition: 2026-01-24 Version
III. Full Text
Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law
The General Assembly
Guided by the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenants on Human Rights, other relevant human rights instruments and the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action;
Affirming the importance of addressing the question of remedies and reparation for victims of gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law in a systematic and thorough way at the national and international levels;
Recognizing that, in honouring the victims’ right to benefit from remedies and reparation, the international community keeps faith with the plight of victims, survivors and future human generations and reaffirms international law in the field;
Recalling the adoption of these Basic Principles and Guidelines by the Commission on Human Rights in its resolution 2005/35 of 19 April 2005 and by the Economic and Social Council in its resolution 2005/30 of 25 July 2005;
1. Adopts the Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law annexed to the present resolution.
2. Recommends that States take the Basic Principles and Guidelines into account, promote respect thereof and bring them to the attention of executive bodies of government, legislative bodies, the judiciary, victims and their representatives, human rights defenders, lawyers, the media and the public.
3. Requests the Secretary-General to ensure the widest possible dissemination of the Basic Principles and Guidelines in all official languages of the United Nations.
Annex
Preamble
Recalling the provisions providing a right to a remedy for victims of violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law in numerous international and regional instruments;
Recalling the Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power adopted by General Assembly resolution 40/34 of 29 November 1985;
Reaffirming that victims should be treated with compassion and respect for their dignity and have full access to justice and redress mechanisms;
Affirming that these Basic Principles and Guidelines are directed at gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law which constitute an affront to human dignity;
Emphasizing that these Principles do not create new legal obligations but clarify the implementation of existing obligations;
Convinced that adopting a victim-oriented perspective affirms human solidarity with victims and with humanity at large;
Adopts the following Basic Principles and Guidelines:
I. Obligation to Respect, Ensure Respect for and Implement International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law
1. The obligation to respect, ensure respect for and implement international human rights law and international humanitarian law emanates from:
(a) Treaties to which a State is a party;
(b) Customary international law;
(c) The domestic law of each State.
2. States shall ensure that their domestic law is consistent with their international legal obligations by incorporating international norms, providing access to justice and making available adequate, effective and prompt remedies, including reparation.
II. Scope of the Obligation
3. The obligation includes the duty to prevent violations, investigate them effectively, provide equal access to justice and ensure effective remedies, including reparation.
III. Gross Violations Constituting Crimes under International Law
4. States have the duty to investigate and prosecute persons allegedly responsible for gross violations and, if found guilty, to punish them.
5. States shall incorporate provisions for universal jurisdiction and cooperate in extradition, surrender and judicial assistance consistent with international human rights standards.
IV. Statutes of Limitations
6. Statutes of limitations shall not apply to gross violations constituting crimes under international law.
7. Other statutes of limitations should not be unduly restrictive.
V. Victims
8. Victims are persons who suffered harm individually or collectively as a result of gross violations or serious violations.
9. A person shall be considered a victim regardless of the identification or conviction of the perpetrator.
VI. Treatment of Victims
10. Victims should be treated with humanity and respect for their dignity and human rights.
VII. Victims’ Right to Remedies
11. Remedies include access to justice, reparation and access to relevant information.
VIII. Access to Justice
12–14. States shall ensure equal access to effective judicial remedies and appropriate international processes.
IX. Reparation for Harm Suffered
15–23. Reparation includes restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition.
X. Access to Relevant Information
24. Victims have the right to seek and obtain information concerning violations and reparation mechanisms.
XI. Non-discrimination
25. These Principles shall be applied without discrimination of any kind.
XII. Non-derogation
26. Nothing in these Principles shall be construed as restricting existing rights or obligations.
XIII. Rights of Others
27. Nothing in this document shall derogate from the rights of others, including the right of the accused to due process.
IV. VST Editorial Disclaimer
- Disclaimer:The translation and editorial commentary reflect the author’s personal academic and professional views for public education and institutional comparison purposes only. Unless otherwise stated, content is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
- How to Cite:
- Revision & Update Log: 2026-01-24— Initial publication
Translator’s Preface
The Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law (hereinafter “the Basic Principles”), adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2005, is an international legal instrument of profound importance. It not only reaffirms the right of victims to a remedy and reparation but also further elaborates on the substance of these rights, providing crucial guidance for states in addressing such violations. Notably, this document consolidates contemporary international forms of the right to a remedy and reparation and outlines five forms of reparation: restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. It thus establishes a significant milestone for the protection of victims’ rights and provides a concrete and feasible path for states to implement them.
It is particularly noteworthy that although Taiwan undertook a significant amendment of its Crime Victim Rights Protection Act in 2023, there remains considerable room for improvement in the concrete implementation of victims’ rights to a remedy and reparation. Specifically, of the five forms of reparation proposed in the Basic Principles, only some have been partially incorporated into our legal system, and the relevant provisions are not yet comprehensive enough. For example, provisions concerning “restitution” are scattered and lack systematic regulation; while the concept of “rehabilitation” is gaining attention, concrete measures and implementation mechanisms are still underdeveloped; and the legal provisions for “satisfaction” and “guarantees of non-repetition” are almost entirely absent in our country’s laws. Therefore, the Basic Principles hold not only academic value but also immense practical significance. It can serve as a vital reference for future legal amendments in Taiwan and promote the reform and enhancement of related systems. This is the greatest motivation that drove me to undertake this translation project.
This translation is based primarily on the official English version from the United Nations, with reference to the terminology used in Taiwan’s current relevant laws, particularly the provisions of the Crime Victim Rights Protection Act. In the translation process, I have striven to accurately convey the meaning of the original text and, as much as possible, to use vocabulary common within Taiwan’s legal community to ensure both accuracy and readability. For certain terms that do not yet have a clear corresponding concept in Taiwan’s legal system, I have cautiously selected appropriate translations based on the original meaning and local legal practice, maintaining consistency throughout the text.
The translation of these Basic Principles is not merely an academic exercise but also an act of rights advocacy. It is my hope that through this translation, more people will recognize the importance of a victim’s right to a remedy and reparation. I also hope this effort may serve to encourage a wider discussion, eventually prompting the relevant authorities to propose a formal, official version to facilitate related work in our country. This translation represents my personal interpretation and does not reflect the position of any institution with which I am affiliated. As errors and omissions are inevitable, I sincerely welcome corrections and guidance from experts and peers to make this translation more complete.
I-Min Hsiao
February 5, 2025
